Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Matrix Representation of Special Relativity

The possibility to represent Minkowski spacetime vectors with 2x2-matrices is well-known since the 1920ies . It is a consequence of the fact, that the Lorentz-group is homomorphic
to the group of unimodular binary matrices SL(2, C). This matrix representation is mostly used to show, how covariant equations for spinors can be derived.But it is widely ignored, that on the other hand, this also can lead to another description of spacetime itself. There also seems to exist a general consensus, that both representations (matrix form and usual component form) are actually equivalent methods to express the equations of Special Relativity, and consequently the matrix form is used very rarely in publications. One principal reason for this is surely the fact, that conventional component formulas can be formally applied to an arbitrary number of dimensions of the vector space, while the matrix form is only possible for the four-dimensional case. In this article I show, that the presumed equivalence of both forms is not true. Although the equations are isomorphic (otherwise they would be wrong), significantly less prerequisites are needed to derive them for the matrix form. The most important prerequsite is the existence of a metric tensor with the signature (+−− −), that has to be postulated for the vector space, but it is automatically determined for the matrix formalism. In principle, any metric signature would be conceivable for the vector space. Since the metric tensor is at least implicitely contained in every relativistic equation, this statement shows, that the matrix form is superior.

6 comments:

  1. Vasken, did you understand your post?? what is behind it? can you explain?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow! Finally I got a blog from where I be capable of really get useful information regarding my study and knowledge.
    you may like the .pdf piece written by : Scott Tucker on quantum mechanics for beginners
    Look at my site ... Scott Tucker

    ReplyDelete
  3. Highly descriptive post, I enjoyed that bit. Will there be a
    part 2?
    Here is my page : glass bong review

    ReplyDelete
  4. Valuable info. Fortunate me I fоunԁ уour web ѕite
    bу aсcіdent, аnd I am surprіseԁ
    why this twist of fatе didn't took place in advance! I bookmarked it.
    Feel free to surf my weblog - scott tucker morgan stanley

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello there! This article could not be written much better!
    Going through this post reminds me of my previous roommate!
    He constantly kept preaching about this. I'll forward this information to him. Fairly certain he's going to have a
    great read. Thank you for sharing!
    My weblog :: ameri Loan

    ReplyDelete